Never cease to doubt it

Political affairs are not something rules can lead. This is why public international law and the so-called international economic law (as is different from rules governing international commercial transactions and disputes) keep disappointing me. At this point, I realise that law actually can solve NOTHING in such power-determined arena, and there's no such thing as international 'law'. As long as there are states, there is no way for an international, universal, rule.

Steinberg's article is just a trigger. -- he titled it as Power and Cooperation in International Environmental Law, funny. When he says it is rather political than others, it means the 'documents' are NOT LAW! I insist.

No one should call a multipal-standard and lack-of-accepted-doctrine rule, law.